Partial weight bearing in hip fracture rehabilitation

Orthopedic rehabilitation is very important for ensuring the best outcomes of treatment for musculoskeletal disorders and disabilities, especially in terms of hip fracture in old-aged patients. This field of research attempts to maximize the use of biomechanics and biology to improve functional outcomes and the overall well-being of patients. Orthopedic rehabilitation is a very important part of every musculoskeletal care delivery system. This article highlights recent research and advances in hip fracture in geriatric patients’ rehabilitation. Hip fractures in older patients are one of the most common injuries; in the USA alone, in 2003, hip fracture cases represented around 30% of all hospitalized cases [1]. Early postoperative improvement has been shown to improve following early ambulation after hip surgery, and early mobility enhances early recovery. When therapists use partial weight bearing, it helps early recovery [2]. Some degree of weight bearing is very important to activate osteoblasts and other cells responsible for bone healing. Further complications may result from immobilization postsurgery. In an attempt to generate a maximum mechanical environment at different stages of fracture healing, many studies prescribe partial weight bearing for lower extremities after a period of nonweight bearing. Partial weight bearing includes increasing weight loading on the limb progressively over time, which varies between patients based on the extent of the injury and the judgment of the clinician [3]. Control of postoperative pain is a vital part of rehabilitation for ensuring patient safety [4]. Partial weight bearing is prescribed for patients following pelvic fracture to protect the healing of bone and/or surgical constructs and provide a stimulus for bone growth. To date, the ability of patients to produce partial weight bearing is attached to their ability to reproduce partial weight-bearing orders; in other words, when the therapist provides clear and comprehensive orders of how much weight should put on the patient’s affected limb, this leads to accurate weight bearing and good healing [5]. A study by Yu et al. [6] attempted to measure the ability of patients to reproduce partial weight-bearing orders with the hand under foot, bathroom scale and verbal methods of instruction, as well as to determine the effect of partial weight bearing on long-term clinical outcomes. This study concluded that partial weight bearing could not accurately be reproduced with any of the weight-bearing techniques prescribed, which was supported by previous evidence showing an inability to accurately reproduce partial weight-bearing orders. Biomechanically, nonweight-bearing causes the effective center of gravity to move distally and away from the nonsupporting leg. This increases abductor muscle forces, which results in joint compressive forces that are several times the body weight [7]. Consequently, partial weight bearing or at least toe-touch weight bearing is favorable. The use of biofeedback devices seems promising to support weight-bearing instructions. Smart steps and biofeedback devices could provide